Nature of Power in Shakespeares Julius Caesar :: William Shakespeare

Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is a political drama which examines the nature of power and leadership in capital of Italy. A conspiracy of eight men, headed by Cassius and Brutus, plan the assignation of their leader, Julius Caesar. How incessantly while Cassius is driven by envy, Brutus on the other hand believes he is acting for the not bad(predicate) of Rome. In Rome at the start of the play there is a vibrant atmosphere. As Caesar overthrows Pompey for the crown the crowd erupt into delight. In spite of the overcome support he still has a few doubters still lurking around. One of the discontented few, Brutus, opposes the idea of Caesar becoming King and gaining march on power. I do fear the wad who choose Caesar for their King. Brutus is heedful that this decision may effect the welfare of Rome by shattering the republic. Brutus is adamant that Romes success was built on the fact that they had no ruler with his only line of thought being to weigh up what will benef it Rome and its people the most. Cassius viewpoint on the issue is we shouldnt ever even contemplated offering Caesar this position. I was born free of Caesar and so were you. Cassius is saying that it was the rash of us to offer him power as this will harm Rome and take away. However Caesar has done very little wrong. The spite for Caesar erects from the view that he may gain too much power which illustrates the envy tangle towards him. Another argument he compiled from him was that he found to his knowledge that Caesar couldnt handle pressure.And when the fit was on him I did mark how he did shake. He is mentioning at how he thinks this unkingly attribute he possesses hardly makes him fit for the job. It furthermore shows the extent of his envy by scrapping for little details like this. Brutus doesnt seem to agree with this.Be any further moved by what you have said, I will consider what you have to say. The word consider reveals his caution as he attempts to decide in due quarr el rather than to rush into the decision. It outlines him showing a sign of weakness by considering something he disagrees with. If he wasnt so open minded then the pairing of Brutus and Cassius may not of lasted.